Anti-Second Amendment Lawfare
And State Abuse Of Process

Rules for thee, but not for me. This should be the official motto of the left. As most Americans take care to stay on the right side of the law, even when we disagree or have our civil rights violated, conservatives remain at a constant disadvantage as anti-Second Amendment leftists spend a great deal of their time trying to circumvent the law.

This phenomenon is not exclusive to individual rights, however, as these groups have long since used lawfare against the firearm industry, unabashedly declaring that if they cannot have their way legally, they'll simply bankrupt businesses through misuse of the judicial system. In the last week, attorneys general for Minnesota and New Jersey filed conspicuously similar lawsuits against firearms manufacturer Glock while also joining fourteen more attorneys general to collude in a multistate coalition aimed at attacking the entire firearms industry.

Let's start with actions filed against Glock. Minnesota and New Jersey claim the manufacturer's firearms are too easy to modify illegally, violating state law. The coordinated attack, undoubtedly bolstered by the Biden administration, disregards Glock's compliance with applicable laws, instead demanding the company abide by arbitrary laws requiring "reasonable controls" aimed at preventing misuse of its products.

Under these strategically vague provisions, complying with regulations and protocols set by lawmakers is inadequate, holding firearms manufacturers to a standard by which they must have a crystal ball to anticipate how criminals may misuse their products and then institute measures to prevent criminal behavior. .....